As ordered reported by the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs on May 14, 2026
By Fiscal Year, Millions of Dollars | 2026 | 2026-2031 | 2026-2036 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Direct Spending (Outlays) | 0 | 21 | -58 | ||||||||
Revenues | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
Increase or Decrease (-) in the Deficit | 0 | 21 | -58 | ||||||||
Spending Subject to Appropriation (Outlays) | 0 | 39 | 39 | ||||||||
Increases net direct spending in any of the four consecutive 10-year periods beginning in 2037? | No | Statutory pay-as-you-go procedures apply? | Yes | ||||||||
Mandate Effects | |||||||||||
Increases on-budget deficits in any of the four consecutive 10-year periods beginning in 2037? | No | Contains intergovernmental mandate? | No | ||||||||
Contains private-sector mandate? | No | ||||||||||
The bill would
| |||||||||||
Estimated budgetary effects would mainly stem from
| |||||||||||
On This Page
Bill Summary
H.R. 2283 would require the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to establish a three-year pilot program to provide grants to eligible providers of outpatient mental health care that serve veterans. The bill also would extend certain VA housing loan fees through July 24, 2034.
Estimated Federal Cost
Table 1. Estimated Budgetary Effects of H.R. 2283 | |||||||||||||
By Fiscal Year, Millions of Dollars | |||||||||||||
2026 | 2027 | 2028 | 2029 | 2030 | 2031 | 2032 | 2033 | 2034 | 2035 | 2036 | 2026-2031 | 2026-2036 | |
Increases or Decreases (-) in Direct Spending | |||||||||||||
Estimated Budget Authority | 0 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -79 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 | -58 |
Estimated Outlays | 0 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -79 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 | -58 |
Increases in Spending Subject to Appropriation | |||||||||||||
Estimated Authorization | 0 | 13 | 13 | 13 | * | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 39 | 39 |
Estimated Outlays | 0 | 13 | 13 | 13 | * | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 39 | 39 |
* = between zero and $500,000. | |||||||||||||
Basis of Estimate
Provisions That Affect Direct Spending and Spending Subject to Appropriation
H.R. 2283 would establish a three-year pilot program under which VA would provide grants to mental health care providers who serve veterans in outpatient settings. Grant recipients could use those funds to support outreach, care coordination, clinician training, program implementation and evaluation, and other related activities. The bill would authorize the appropriation of $20 million annually for fiscal years 2027 through 2029 to carry out the pilot program.
CBO expects that VA would spend the authorized amounts over the 2027-2029 period. Using historical spending patterns for similar VA grant programs, CBO estimates that implementing the pilot program would cost $60 million over the 2026-2036 period.
VA uses several appropriation accounts to pay for the costs of health care, disability claims processing, medical research, and information technology modernization. One of those accounts, the Toxic Exposures Fund (TEF), is a mandatory appropriation that can be used to pay for some of the costs of those activities if they support veterans who were exposed to toxic substances or environmental hazards.[1] The other accounts are discretionary appropriations. H.R. 2283 would affect health care that benefits veterans with and without toxic exposures; therefore, enacting the bill would increase direct spending from the TEF as well as spending subject to appropriation. CBO allocates the estimated costs of legislation between the TEF and the discretionary appropriation accounts on the basis of the portion of all funding for those activities that are projected, in CBO’s baseline, to come from the TEF.
On that basis, CBO estimates that over the 2026-2036 period, implementing the pilot grant program under H.R. 2283 would increase direct spending by $21 million and spending subject to appropriation by $39 million.
Direct Spending
In total, CBO estimates that enacting H.R. 2283 would decrease net direct spending by $58 million over the 2026-2036 period (see Table 2).
The discussion under “Provisions That Affect Direct Spending and Spending Subject to Appropriation” describes the costs of implementing the pilot grant program for providers of outpatient mental health care. Those changes would increase direct spending by $21 million over the 2026-2036 period.
In addition, H.R. 2283 would reduce direct spending by $79 million by extending higher fees for VA home loan guarantees. The bill would extend—for about seven weeks—the higher fees that VA charges borrowers for its loan guarantees. VA provides loan guarantees to lenders that allow eligible borrowers to obtain better loan terms—such as lower interest rates or smaller down payments—to purchase, construct, improve, or refinance a home. VA typically pays lenders up to 25 percent of the outstanding mortgage balance if a borrower’s home is foreclosed upon. Those payments, net of fees paid by borrowers and recoveries by lenders, constitute the subsidy cost for the loan guarantees.[2]
Table 2. Estimated Changes in Direct Spending Under H.R. 2283 | |||||||||||||
By Fiscal Year, Millions of Dollars | |||||||||||||
2026 | 2027 | 2028 | 2029 | 2030 | 2031 | 2032 | 2033 | 2034 | 2035 | 2036 | 2026-2031 | 2026-2036 | |
Grants for Mental Health Care | |||||||||||||
Estimated Budget Authority | 0 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 21 |
Estimated Outlays | 0 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 21 |
Home Loan Fees | |||||||||||||
Estimated Budget Authority | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -79 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -79 |
Estimated Outlays | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -79 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -79 |
Total Changes | |||||||||||||
Estimated Budget Authority | 0 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -79 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 | -58 |
Estimated Outlays | 0 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -79 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 | -58 |
CBO projects that, on average, VA will annually guarantee around 600,000 loans of roughly $490,000 each at a subsidy rate of 0.93 percent, and that those loan guarantees are projected to cost $27.5 billion over the 2026-2036 period. Under current law, the rates for most of the fees that borrowers currently pay average about 2.3 percent of their loan amount; for loans guaranteed after June 9, 2034, those rates will drop to about 1.2 percent of the loan amount. The bill would extend the higher rates through July 24, 2034, which would reduce the subsidy cost of loans guaranteed during that period, thereby decreasing direct spending.
Using its forecast of loan volume based on data provided by VA, CBO estimates that extending the higher fee rates as specified in the bill would decrease net direct spending by $79 million over the 2026‑2036 period.
Spending Subject to Appropriation
In addition to authorizing appropriations for grants to outpatient mental health providers, the bill also would require VA to report to the Congress on the outcomes and effectiveness of the pilot program. On the basis of the costs of similar reporting requirements, CBO estimates that satisfying that requirement would cost less than $500,000 over the 2026-2036 period.
CBO estimates that, in total, implementing H.R. 2283 would increase spending subject to appropriation by $39 million over the 2026-2036 period.
Pay-As-You-Go Considerations
Increase in Long-Term Net Direct Spending and Deficits
CBO estimates that enacting H.R. 2283 would not increase net direct spending or on‑budget deficits in any of the four consecutive 10-year periods beginning in 2037.
Mandates
Estimate Prepared By
Federal Costs:
Noah Callahan (for veterans’ health care)
Paul Holland (for veterans’ home loans)
Mandates: Brandon Lever
Estimate Reviewed By
David Newman
Chief, Defense, International Affairs, and Veterans’ Affairs Cost Estimates Unit
Kathleen FitzGerald
Chief, Public and Private Mandates Unit
Christina Hawley Anthony
Deputy Director of Budget Analysis
Estimate Approved By

Phillip L. Swagel
Director, Congressional Budget Office
1.For additional information about estimated spending from the TEF, see Congressional Budget Office, “Toxic Exposures Fund—February 2026 Baseline” (February 2026), https://tinyurl.com/5c2kp8fs, and How CBO Would Estimate the Effects of Future Authorizing Legislation on Spending From the Toxic Exposures Fund (December 2022), https://www.cbo.gov/publication/58843.
2.Under the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990, the subsidy cost of a loan guarantee is the net present value of estimated payments by the government to cover defaults and delinquencies, interest subsidies, or other expenses offset by any payments to the government, including origination or other fees, penalties, and recoveries on defaulted loans. Such subsidy costs are calculated by discounting those expected cash flows using the rate on Treasury securities of comparable maturity. The resulting estimated subsidy costs are recorded in the budget when the loans are disbursed or modified. A positive subsidy indicates that the loan results in net outlays from the Treasury; a negative subsidy indicates that the loan results in net receipts to the Treasury.