As ordered reported by the House Committee on Ways and Means on May 21, 2026
By Fiscal Year, Millions of Dollars | 2026 | 2026-2031 | 2026-2036 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Direct Spending (Outlays) | 0 | 149 | 4,980 | ||||||||
Revenues | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
Increase or Decrease (-) in the Deficit | 0 | 149 | 4,980 | ||||||||
Spending Subject to Appropriation (Outlays) | 0 | * | not estimated | ||||||||
Increases net direct spending in any of the four consecutive 10-year periods beginning in 2037? | > $2.5 billion | Statutory pay-as-you-go procedures apply? | Yes | ||||||||
Mandate Effects | |||||||||||
Increases on-budget deficits in any of the four consecutive 10-year periods beginning in 2037? | > $5 billion | Contains intergovernmental mandate? | No | ||||||||
Contains private-sector mandate? | No | ||||||||||
* = between zero and $500,000. | |||||||||||
The bill would
| |||||||||||
Estimated budgetary effects would mainly stem from
| |||||||||||
Areas of significant uncertainty include
| |||||||||||
On This Page
Bill Summary
Estimated Federal Cost
Table 1. Estimated Budgetary Effects of H.R. 8163 | |||||||||||||
By Fiscal Year, Millions of Dollars | |||||||||||||
2026 | 2027 | 2028 | 2029 | 2030 | 2031 | 2032 | 2033 | 2034 | 2035 | 2036 | 2026-2031 | 2026-2036 | |
Increases in Direct Spending | |||||||||||||
Estimated Budget Authority | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 149 | 387 | 706 | 967 | 1,182 | 1,589 | 149 | 4,980 |
Estimated Outlays | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 149 | 387 | 706 | 967 | 1,182 | 1,589 | 149 | 4,980 |
CBO estimates that implementing H.R. 8163 would increase spending subject to appropriation by less than $500,000 over the 2026-2031 period. | |||||||||||||
Basis of Estimate
Direct Spending
CBO estimates that enacting H.R. 8163 would increase net direct spending by $5 billion over the 2026-2036 period.
CMS sets payment amounts in the PFS for medical services provided by physicians and certain other clinicians. Each service is assigned relative value units (RVUs), which, after adjustments for geographic variations in costs, are multiplied by a conversion factor to determine payment amounts. The conversion factor, similar to a base payment rate, is a dollar amount updated annually according to a formula in the law. The underlying statute requires budget neutrality adjustments to be applied to spending under the PFS. Budget neutrality requires that total spending not increase or decrease by more than a specified amount when RVUs are revised or new services are added. As a result, significant increases in RVUs for some services reduce payments for others. CMS adjusts the conversion factor on the basis of projected spending for new or revised services. Under current law, the agency makes no further adjustments to account for actual spending for those services.
H.R. 8163 would require CMS to revise budget neutrality adjustments once data on actual spending become available.
Between 2015 and 2025, CBO identified two instances in which CMS’s projections exceeded actual spending for a new billing code that would have qualified under the tests established by the bill. Over the same period, CBO found no qualifying services for which actual spending exceeded CMS’s projections by more than the bill’s threshold; CBO therefore did not incorporate any downward corrections into this estimate.
In 2015, on the basis of spending projections for a new chronic care management code, CMS applied a negative budget neutrality adjustment of about 0.25 percent to the conversion factor. Data on actual spending later indicated that a smaller adjustment, of about 0.05 percent, would have been more accurate, thus leaving a gap in the conversion factor of about 0.20 percentage points.
In the second instance, in 2024, CMS applied a negative budget neutrality adjustment of about 2.0 percent to the conversion factor because of a new add-on code for evaluation and management complexity. Data on actual spending later indicated that an adjustment of about 0.4 percent would have been more accurate, leaving a gap of about 1.6 percentage points. Together, those episodes account for a gap in the conversion factor of about 1.8 percentage points. If provisions in H.R. 8163 were applied, the gap would be restored, and the conversion factor would increase by 1.8 percent.
On that basis, CBO projects a 1-in-10 likelihood that each of those corrections would occur in any given year of a 10-year budget window, which together imply an expected correction of 0.18 percentage points per year. Because CBO views the 2024 add-on code as an outlier, only half of that effect was included, which reduced the annual correction from 0.18 percentage points to 0.10 percentage points. For this estimate, that adjustment was applied to CBO’s projection of the annual rate of growth in the conversion factor.
The correction process required by H.R. 8163 would begin in 2029, and each correction would occur in the second year after the year to which it applies. As a result, CBO expects that corrections would begin to affect spending in 2031 and that those effects would accumulate through the end of the 2026-2036 period. The first 0.10 percent annual increase in the conversion factor would apply to the $83 billion in PFS spending projected for 2031 in CBO’s February 2026 baseline; a compounded increase of 0.60 percent would apply to the $98 billion projected for 2036.
Because higher payment rates tend to encourage providers to supply more services, CBO expects that an increase in volume would follow an increase in payment rates. CBO estimates that increases in the conversion factor, together with the resulting supply response, would increase outlays for Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) by $2.5 billion over the 2026-2036 period.
The estimated increase in FFS spending would also increase payments to Medicare Advantage plans and collections of Part B premiums. Under current law, CMS sets benchmark rates for payments to Medicare Advantage plans using estimated per capita spending for FFS Medicare. CBO estimates that the increase in Medicare Advantage spending would be 1.5 to 1.7 times the annual FFS increase. Part B premiums fund roughly one-quarter of both FFS and Medicare Advantage costs. As a result, CBO estimates that additional premium collections would offset about one-quarter of the increase in FFS and Medicare Advantage spending. After accounting for those interactions, CBO estimates that enacting H.R. 8163 would increase net direct spending by $5 billion over the 2026-2036 period.
H.R. 8163 also would raise the dollar threshold for budget neutrality adjustments, require the data used to calculate practice expense RVUs to be updated at least once every five years, and limit the annual budget neutrality adjustment to the conversion factor to no more than 2.5 percent in either direction. CBO estimates that enacting those provisions would affect direct spending by less than $500,000 over the 2026-2036 period.
Spending Subject to Appropriation
Using information about similar activities, CBO estimates that issuing regulations under H.R. 8163 would cost CMS less than $500,000 over the 2026-2031 period. Any related spending would be subject to the availability of appropriated funds.
Uncertainty
Pay-As-You-Go Considerations
Table 2. CBO’s Estimate of the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Effects of H.R. 8163, the Provider Reimbursement Stability Act, as Ordered Reported by the House Committee on Ways and Means on May 21, 2026 | |||||||||||||
By Fiscal Year, Millions of Dollars | |||||||||||||
2026 | 2027 | 2028 | 2029 | 2030 | 2031 | 2032 | 2033 | 2034 | 2035 | 2036 | 2026-2031 | 2026-2036 | |
Net Increase in the Deficit | |||||||||||||
Pay-As-You-Go Effect | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 149 | 387 | 706 | 967 | 1,182 | 1,589 | 149 | 4,980 |
Increase in Long-Term Net Direct Spending and Deficits
CBO estimates that enacting H.R. 8163 would increase on‑budget deficits by more than $5 billion in any of the four consecutive 10-year periods beginning in 2037.
Mandates
Estimate Prepared By
Mandates: Andrew Laughlin
Estimate Reviewed By
Sarah Sajewski
Chief, Health Systems and Medicare Cost Estimates Unit
Kathleen FitzGerald
Chief, Public and Private Mandates Unit
Chad Chirico
Director of Budget Analysis
Estimate Approved By

Phillip L. Swagel
Director, Congressional Budget Office