This study looks at technical, operational, and cost issues related to using a boost-phase intercept system to defend the United States against intercontinental ballistic missiles.
A prominent part of the Bush Administration’s strategy for national defense is developing and fielding defenses against ballistic missiles. To that end, the Department of Defense’s Missile Defense Agency (MDA) is pursuing a layered defense composed of various systems capable of intercepting ballistic missiles at different points in their flight. For the past several years, work has primarily focused on intercepting long-range missiles during their mid-course phase (after their booster rockets have burned out but before their warheads have re-entered the atmosphere). MDA plans to field initial elements of a midcourse system this year. Recently, the agency also began an effort to develop interceptors capable of hitting intercontinental ballistic missiles during their boost phase (the first few minutes after launch, before their booster rockets burn out).
This CBO study—prepared at the request of the Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities of the Senate Armed Services Committee—looks at technical, operational, and cost issues related to using a boost-phase intercept (BPI) system to defend the United States against intercontinental ballistic missiles. The study compares the strengths, weaknesses, and costs of five alternative designs for a BPI system—three surface-based and two space-based—that span a range of performance characteristics. In keeping with CBO’s mandate to provide objective, impartial analysis, this study makes no recommendations.
