Congressional Budget Office

Supporting the congress since 1975

Congressional Budget Office

contact cbo

  • home
  • about
  • topics
  • cost estimates
  • my cbo

Poverty and Income Security

The share of people living in the United States in families with income below the official federal poverty threshold has fluctuated between about 11 percent and about 15 percent over the past several decades. CBO analyzes a wide variety of federal programs that aim to reduce poverty, alleviate some of poverty's adverse consequences, and enhance income security.

Sub-Topics:

  • Food and Nutrition Programs
  • Medicaid and CHIP
  • Social Security
  • Supplemental Security Income (SSI)
  • Taxes for Low-Income Households (EITC)

monthly archive

  • May 2013 (2)
  • April 2013 (14)
  • March 2013 (22)
  • February 2013 (10)
  • January 2013 (11)
  • December 2012 (4)
  • November 2012 (10)
  • October 2012 (4)
  • September 2012 (6)
  • August 2012 (5)
  • July 2012 (11)
  • June 2012 (8)
browse all
  • Sign Up For CBO Emails
  • Sign up for All CBO RSS Feeds

Some Context for Thinking About Deficit Reduction: Social Security and Major Health Care Programs

blog post

September 28, 2011


  • Sign Up For CBO Emails
  • Sign up for All CBO RSS Feeds

SSI Extension for Elderly and Disabled Refugees Act of 2011

cost estimate

September 30, 2011

read complete document  (pdf, 15 kb)

monthly archive

  • May 2013 (2)
  • April 2013 (14)
  • March 2013 (22)
  • February 2013 (10)
  • January 2013 (11)
  • December 2012 (4)
  • November 2012 (10)
  • October 2012 (4)
  • September 2012 (6)
  • August 2012 (5)
  • July 2012 (11)
  • June 2012 (8)
browse all
  • Sign Up For CBO Emails
  • Sign up for All CBO RSS Feeds

CBO's Long-Term Social Security Projections

blog post

August 5, 2011


  • document
  • Data Underlying Selected Figures
  • blog post
  • Sign Up For CBO Emails
  • Sign up for All CBO RSS Feeds

CBO's 2011 Long-Term Projections for Social Security: Additional Information

report

August 5, 2011

read complete document  (pdf, 509 kb)

Highlights

Social Security is the federal government's largest single program. About 56 million people will receive Social Security benefits this year, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates. About 69 percent are retired workers, their spouses, and children, and another 12 percent are survivors of deceased workers; all of those beneficiaries receive payments through Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI). The other 19 percent are disabled workers or their spouses and children; they receive Disability Insurance (DI) benefits. CBO projects that in fiscal year 2011, Social Security's outlays will total $733 billion, one-fifth of the federal budget; OASI payments will account for about 82 percent of those outlays, and DI payments, about 18 percent.

View more presentations from Congressional Budget Office

Social Security has two primary sources of tax revenues: payroll taxes and income taxes on benefits. This year, roughly 97 percent of tax revenues dedicated to Social Security will be collected from a payroll tax of 12.4 percent that is levied on earnings and split evenly between workers and their employers at 6.2 percent apiece (except for self-employed workers, who pay the entire 12.4 percent tax on earnings themselves). The payroll tax applies only to taxable earnings—earnings up to a maximum annual amount ($106,800 in 2011). Some Social Security benefits also are subject to taxation: This year, about 3 percent of Social Security's tax revenues will come from the income taxes that higher-income beneficiaries pay on their Social Security benefits. Tax revenues credited to the program will total $687 billion in fiscal year 2011.

Revenues from taxes, along with intragovernmental interest payments, are credited to Social Security's two trust funds—one for OASI and one for DI—and the program's benefits and administrative costs are paid from those funds. Legally, the funds are separate, but they often are described collectively as the OASDI trust funds. In a given year, the sum of receipts to a fund along with the interest that is credited on previous balances, minus spending for benefits and administrative costs, constitutes that fund's surplus or deficit.

In calendar year 2010, for the first time since the enactment of the Social Security Amendments of 1983, annual outlays for the program exceeded annual revenues excluding interest credited to the trust funds. CBO projects that the gap will continue: Over the next five years, outlays will be about 5 percent greater than such revenues. However, as more members of the baby-boom generation (that is, people born between 1946 and 1964) enter retirement, outlays will increase relative to the size of the economy, whereas tax revenues will remain at an almost constant share of the economy. As a result, the shortfall will begin to grow around 2017.

CBO projects that the DI trust fund will be exhausted in 2017 and that the OASI trust fund will be exhausted in 2040. Once a trust fund's balance has fallen to zero and current revenues are insufficient to cover the benefits that are specified in law, the corresponding program will be unable to pay full benefits without changes in law. The DI trust fund came close to exhaustion in 1994, but that outcome was prevented by legislation that redirected revenues from the OASI trust fund to the DI trust fund. In part because of that experience, it is a common analytical convention to consider the DI and OASI trust funds as combined. CBO projects that, if legislation to shift resources from the OASI trust fund to the DI trust fund was enacted, the combined OASDI trust funds would be exhausted in 2038.

The amount of Social Security taxes paid by various groups of people differs, as do the benefits that different groups receive. For example, people with higher earnings pay more in Social Security payroll taxes than do lower-earning participants, and they also receive larger benefits (although not proportionately larger). Because of the progressive nature of Social Security's benefit formula, replacement rates—annual benefits as a percentage of annual lifetime earnings—are lower, on average, for workers who have had higher earnings. As another example, the amount of taxes paid and benefits received will be greater for people in later birth cohorts because they typically will have higher earnings over a lifetime, even after an adjustment for inflation, CBO projects. However, initial replacement rates will be slightly lower, on average, for people in later birth groups because their full retirement age (the age at which they can receive unreduced retirement benefits) will be higher. The increase in that age is equivalent to a reduction in benefits at any age at which benefits are claimed.



  • Sign Up For CBO Emails
  • Sign up for All CBO RSS Feeds

CBO's 2011 Long-Term Projections for Social Security: Infographic

image

August 5, 2011

read complete document  (pdf, 0 kb)

Highlights

CBO's 2011 Long-Term Projections for Social Security: Additional Information CBO's 2011 Long-Term Budget Outlook Social Security Policy Options CBO's 2011 Long-Term Projections for Social Security: Additional Information CBO's 2011 Long-Term Budget Outlook Social Security Policy Options

Social Security Infographic



monthly archive

  • May 2013 (2)
  • April 2013 (14)
  • March 2013 (22)
  • February 2013 (10)
  • January 2013 (11)
  • December 2012 (4)
  • November 2012 (10)
  • October 2012 (4)
  • September 2012 (6)
  • August 2012 (5)
  • July 2012 (11)
  • June 2012 (8)
browse all
  • Sign Up For CBO Emails
  • Sign up for All CBO RSS Feeds

A Description of the Immigrant Population: An Update

blog post

June 3, 2011


  • blog post
  • Sign Up For CBO Emails
  • Sign up for All CBO RSS Feeds

A Description of the Immigrant Population: An Update

report

June 2, 2011

read complete document  (pdf, 0 kb)

Abstract

This document is the latest in CBO's series on immigration. It updates A Description of the Immigrant Population (November 2004), providing an overview of the nation's foreign-born population, with a particular focus on the years 2000 to 2009. It discusses changes in the numbers and countries of origin foreign-born people and their U.S. residency and citizenship status, and it compares demographic and labor market characteristics of foreign-born and native-born people in the United States.


Highlights

A Description of the Immigrant Population: An Update
View more presentations from Congressional Budget Office


monthly archive

  • May 2013 (2)
  • April 2013 (14)
  • March 2013 (22)
  • February 2013 (10)
  • January 2013 (11)
  • December 2012 (4)
  • November 2012 (10)
  • October 2012 (4)
  • September 2012 (6)
  • August 2012 (5)
  • July 2012 (11)
  • June 2012 (8)
browse all
  • Sign Up For CBO Emails
  • Sign up for All CBO RSS Feeds

The Underfunding of State and Local Pension Plans

blog post

May 4, 2011


  • blog post
  • Sign Up For CBO Emails
  • Sign up for All CBO RSS Feeds

The Underfunding of State and Local Pension Plans

report

May 4, 2011

read complete document  (pdf, 660 kb)

Abstract

The recent financial crisis and economic recession have left many states and localities with extraordinary budgetary difficulties for the next few years, but structural shortfalls in their pension plans pose a problem that is likely to endure for much longer. This issue brief discusses alternative approaches to assessing the size of those shortfalls and their implications for funding decisions.


Highlights

The recent financial crisis and economic recession have left many states and localities with extraordinary budgetary difficulties for the next few years, but structural shortfalls in their pension plans pose a problem that is likely to endure for much longer. This issue brief discusses alternative approaches to assessing the size of those shortfalls and the implications of those approaches for funding decisions:

  • By any measure, nearly all state and local pension plans are underfunded, which means that the value of the plans' assets is less than their accrued pension liabilities for current workers and retirees.
  • There are two leading approaches for valuing assets and liabilities, and the reported amount of underfunding varies significantly depending on which one is used.
  • Decisions about how to address the underfunding can be informed by the choice between those two measurement approaches, but there is no necessary connection between the information provided by the two approaches and decisions about how much a plan's sponsor should contribute each year.

According to the Public Fund Survey of 126 state and local pension plans, which account for about 85 percent of pension assets and participants in state and local pension plans in the United States, those plans held roughly $2.6 trillion in financial assets in 2009 but had about $3.3 trillion in liabilities for future pension payments. Thus, those assets covered less than 80 percent of liabilities, and unfunded liabilities (the amount by which liabilities exceed assets) amounted to roughly $0.7 trillion. That share of liabilities covered by assets in 2009 was the lowest percentage in the past 20 years. By comparison, the amount of state and local governments' debt that was outstanding at the end of 2009 was $2.4 trillion.

That estimate of unfunded liabilities is calculated on the basis of actuarial guidelines currently followed by state and local governments. Another approach for measuring pension assets and liabilities, which more fully accounts for the costs that pension obligations pose for taxpayers, yields a much larger estimate of unfunded liabilities for those plans in 2009—between $2 trillion and $3 trillion.

In any event, most state and local pension plans probably will have sufficient assets, earnings, and contributions to pay scheduled benefits for a number of years and thus will not need to address their funding shortfalls immediately. But they will probably have to do so eventually, and the longer they wait, the larger those shortfalls could become. Most of the additional funding needed to cover pension liabilities is likely to take the form of higher government contributions and therefore will require higher taxes or reduced government services for residents. Additional funding for pension benefits already accrued is unlikely to come from current workers; state laws and court opinions indicate that efforts toward that end could be successfully challenged in court in the majority of states.

Decisions about the amount and timing of the additional funding for underfunded plans will depend on many factors, including competing budgetary priorities, views on intergenerational fairness, and the amount of risk that plans' sponsors are prepared to take. If the financial condition of state and local pension plans worsened, the federal government might be asked to assist in the funding of such plans. If granted, such assistance would raise the federal deficit and debt, unless offset by higher taxes or lower spending in other areas.



  • Sign Up For CBO Emails
  • Sign up for All CBO RSS Feeds

Selected budget projections - April 2011

data or technical information

April 15, 2011

read complete document  (xls,  kb)

Abstract

These spreadsheets reflect CBO's estimates, assumptions, and projections at the time the associated publication was released; that is, the spreadsheets are not continuously updated.

  • « first
  • ‹ previous
  • …
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • …
  • next ›
  • last »
  • about
  • topics
  • cost estimates
  • my cbo
  • press
  • privacy, security, and copyright policies
  • our business opportunities
  • sitemap

work at cbo

learn more about working at cbo and check out the agency’s career opportunities

stay connected

get cbo’s email updates