Congressional Budget Office

Supporting the congress since 1975

Congressional Budget Office

contact cbo

  • home
  • about
  • topics
  • cost estimates
  • my cbo

National Security

Defense spending accounted for about 20 percent of total federal spending in 2012. CBO analyzes the budgetary effects of proposed legislation related to national security and assesses the cost-effectiveness of current and proposed defense programs. CBO also evaluates federal programs and issues related to veterans.

Sub-Topics:

  • Defense Budget
  • Military Personnel
  • Iraq and Afghanistan
  • Weapon Systems

monthly archive

  • May 2013 (2)
  • April 2013 (14)
  • March 2013 (22)
  • February 2013 (10)
  • January 2013 (11)
  • December 2012 (4)
  • November 2012 (10)
  • October 2012 (4)
  • September 2012 (6)
  • August 2012 (5)
  • July 2012 (11)
  • June 2012 (8)
browse all
  • Sign Up For CBO Emails
  • Sign up for All CBO RSS Feeds

Snapshot of Spending for Military Retirement Pay

posted by Matt Schmit on April 17, 2013

  • Full Text

  • printer-friendly version
  • Screen-friendly Version

related publications


  • Technical Challenges of the U.S. Army’s Ground Combat Vehicle Program: Working Paper 2012-15

    November 06, 2012

  • Approaches for Scaling Back the Defense Department’s Budget Plans

    March 18, 2013

  • Long-Term Implications of the 2013 Future Years Defense Program

    July 11, 2012

  • An Analysis of the Army's Transformation Programs and Possible Alternatives

    June 02, 2009
  • Sign Up For CBO Emails
  • Sign up for All CBO RSS Feeds

The Army’s Ground Combat Vehicle Program and Alternatives

report

April 2, 2013

read complete document  (pdf, 670 kb)

  • Sign Up For CBO Emails
  • Sign up for All CBO RSS Feeds

H.R. 1073, the Nuclear Terrorism Conventions Implementation and Safety of Maritime Navigation Act of 2013

cost estimate

March 19, 2013

read complete document  (pdf, 23 kb)

  • Full Text

  • printer-friendly version
  • screen-friendly version

related publications


  • Long-Term Implications of the 2013 Future Years Defense Program

    July 11, 2012

  • Costs of Military Pay and Benefits in the Defense Budget

    November 14, 2012

  • An Analysis of the Navy’s Fiscal Year 2013 Shipbuilding Plan

    July 25, 2012
  • Sign Up For CBO Emails
  • Sign up for All CBO RSS Feeds

Approaches for Scaling Back the Defense Department’s Budget Plans

report

March 18, 2013

read complete document  (pdf, 1519 kb)

  • Related Documents

  • Snapshot of Spending for Military Retirement Pay
  • Sign Up For CBO Emails
  • Sign up for All CBO RSS Feeds

Military Retirement—February 2013 Baseline

data or technical information

February 5, 2013

read complete document  (pdf, 38 kb)

  • Sign Up For CBO Emails
  • Sign up for All CBO RSS Feeds

H.R. 4310, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013

cost estimate

December 19, 2012

read complete document  (pdf, 21 kb)

  • Full Text

  • printer-friendly version
  • screen-friendly version

  • Supplemental Material

  • blog post

related publications


  • Long-Term Implications of the 2013 Future Years Defense Program

    July 11, 2012

  • Evaluating Military Compensation

    April 28, 2010

  • Evaluating Military Compensation

    June 29, 2007

  • Recruiting, Retention, and Future Levels of Military Personnel

    October 01, 2006

  • The Effects of Proposals to Increase Cost Sharing in TRICARE

    June 05, 2009
  • Sign Up For CBO Emails
  • Sign up for All CBO RSS Feeds

Costs of Military Pay and Benefits in the Defense Budget

report

November 14, 2012

read complete document  (pdf, 659 kb)

monthly archive

  • May 2013 (2)
  • April 2013 (14)
  • March 2013 (22)
  • February 2013 (10)
  • January 2013 (11)
  • December 2012 (4)
  • November 2012 (10)
  • October 2012 (4)
  • September 2012 (6)
  • August 2012 (5)
  • July 2012 (11)
  • June 2012 (8)
browse all
  • Sign Up For CBO Emails
  • Sign up for All CBO RSS Feeds

CBO Releases Report on Costs of Pay and Benefits in the U.S. Military

blog post

November 14, 2012


  • Sign Up For CBO Emails
  • Sign up for All CBO RSS Feeds

Technical Challenges of the U.S. Army’s Ground Combat Vehicle Program: Working Paper 2012-15

working paper

November 6, 2012

read complete document  (pdf, 2901 kb)

Abstract

Bernard Kempinski and Christopher Murphy

The U.S. Army plans to spend about an additional $34 billion in 2013 dollars to develop and purchase a new armored vehicle for its infantry, the Ground Combat Vehicle (GCV). The GCV is supposed to operate across the full range of potential conflict types while providing unprecedented levels of protection for the full squad of soldiers it will carry. To achieve the Army’s goals, the GCV would weigh from 64 to 84 tons, making it the biggest and heaviest infantry fighting vehicle that the Army has ever fielded—as big as the M1 Abrams tank and twice as heavy as the Bradley, the Army’s current infantry fighting vehicle. Designing such a vehicle presents important technical challenges.

To aid the Congress in its oversight of the GCV program, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has prepared two reports. This CBO working paper provides background information for understanding the technical challenges that the program faces. It presents the Army’s technical goals for the GCV program, examines the threats that the vehicle could face in combat, and explores the variety of approaches that vehicle designers can take to protect the vehicle and its passengers and to meet the Army’s other requirements. A companion report, The Army’s Ground Combat Vehicle Program and Alternatives, examines the GCV program (including the number of vehicles, the production schedule, and the cost) and alternative approaches that the Army could take that would cost less but still provide substantial improvements over today’s fleet of combat vehicles.


  • Sign Up For CBO Emails
  • Sign up for All CBO RSS Feeds

Options for Modernizing Military Weather Satellites: Working Paper 2012-11

working paper

September 20, 2012

read complete document  (pdf, 307 kb)

Abstract

By Michael Bennett

Over the next several years, the Department of Defense (DoD) will launch the last of its weather satellites, which it uses to plan military operations and generate weather forecasts. Long-running efforts to develop replacements for those satellites encountered schedule and cost difficulties, and in December 2011, the Congress directed DoD to cancel its latest program and to prepare for a follow-on program. DoD’s plans now call for a new development effort, but it has not yet determined the capabilities it wants in that satellite. In this paper, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) examines three different satellite design concepts that DoD might consider and compares the cost and capability of those designs. The paper also discusses alternative approaches that DoD might take, such as fielding single instruments on several small satellites instead of several instruments on a single satellite and foregoing a new generation of military weather satellites altogether and instead relying on other sources for weather data.


  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • …
  • next ›
  • last »
  • about
  • topics
  • cost estimates
  • my cbo
  • press
  • privacy, security, and copyright policies
  • our business opportunities
  • sitemap

work at cbo

learn more about working at cbo and check out the agency’s career opportunities

stay connected

get cbo’s email updates